FlashFXP Forums - View Single Post

09-01-2002, 06:42 AM

As i've been following the development of several firewall (including those discussed in this thread) i have read MANY tests.
Several firewalls seem to pass many tests..though ZA is the ONLY firewall that has passed with flying colors. So advising someone to get rid of ZA and switch to some other FW is just plain stupid.

As the thread-starter states this matter should be resolved - and NOT by getting rid of ZA.

I used ZA for years myself. Never had ANY problems what-so-ever.

This matter CAN and SHOULD be resolved.

Those of you who claim that ZA sucks obviously have not been following the development of firewalls during the last 5 years.

Sure you can switch to some other firewall. But would that be a solution? Installing a FW that can not protect you in the way that ZA can? I think that is called "false security sence".

MANY problems with ZA occour cause people don't know how to properly configure it.

Just my thoughts...

09-01-2002, 06:42 AM
joc Guest Posts: n/a	FYI As i've been following the development of several firewall (including those discussed in this thread) i have read MANY tests. Several firewalls seem to pass many tests..though ZA is the ONLY firewall that has passed with flying colors. So advising someone to get rid of ZA and switch to some other FW is just plain stupid. As the thread-starter states this matter should be resolved - and NOT by getting rid of ZA. I used ZA for years myself. Never had ANY problems what-so-ever. This matter CAN and SHOULD be resolved. Those of you who claim that ZA sucks obviously have not been following the development of firewalls during the last 5 years. Sure you can switch to some other firewall. But would that be a solution? Installing a FW that can not protect you in the way that ZA can? I think that is called "false security sence". MANY problems with ZA occour cause people don't know how to properly configure it. Just my thoughts...