FlashFXP Forums - View Single Post

msg7086 · 08-15-2011, 01:28 AM

and another improvement (which could be a core level enhancement)

transfer with a server with high network lantancy (300ms+ ping) is far slower than filezilla.

say i'm in china and the server is located near new york city, and i'll have to suffer a delay of 300ms+ or even more. but both sides have good network, plenty of bandwidth. with filezilla i can reach a speed of 3MB/s+ (or even 8MB/s+) easily, but with flashfxp i can only have a peak of 50KB/s (or even less).

the clue could be the tcpwindowsize, or say, transfer as much data as possible before the next ACK package. ymmv.

08-15-2011, 01:28 AM
msg7086 Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Lincoln Park, NJ Posts: 73	and another improvement (which could be a core level enhancement) transfer with a server with high network lantancy (300ms+ ping) is far slower than filezilla. say i'm in china and the server is located near new york city, and i'll have to suffer a delay of 300ms+ or even more. but both sides have good network, plenty of bandwidth. with filezilla i can reach a speed of 3MB/s+ (or even 8MB/s+) easily, but with flashfxp i can only have a peak of 50KB/s (or even less). the clue could be the tcpwindowsize, or say, transfer as much data as possible before the next ACK package. ymmv.